Разговор о войне с Ираном: религиозные ассоциации и оценка хода конфликта
Источник: не указан
Краткое содержание
Неформальная беседа с резкими высказываниями о религиозных основаниях государства Израиль и о том, что война «идёт не в пользу» Израиля. Участники обсуждают символику имен, происхождение слова «El», критикуют политические основания конфликта и утверждают, что удары по Израилю со стороны «Хезболлы» серьёзны.
Основные тезисы
- Государство Израиль трактуется как проект, основанный на мифологии и религиозных нарративах.
- Делается акцент на символике «El» в именах и названиях.
- Звучит утверждение, что Израиль сталкивается с тяжёлым давлением со стороны «Хезболлы».
- Разговор сопровождается саркастическими и провокационными репликами.
Значимость
Фрагмент отражает жанр разговорного политического комментария с религиозными ассоциациями и критикой Израиля без строгой фактологической опоры.
🧾 Транскрипт (формат)
It's land because 3,000 years ago, based on mythology, with a guy with a talking donkey, he said, this land is mine. Yeah. Jacob and Esau, you wrestled an angel. That's what Israel means, one that wrestles with God. Like the whole thing is based on the story. Wow, really? How did I just learn that? El is God because it was from the Sumerian pantheon that they borrowed for God. That's why all the angels in an El, Mike El, Gabriel. Now they're taking an El. They're taking a huge El. Yeah. Can't spell Israel without El, a huge El. Isis, Ra, El, sky God, sun God, and the over God. So Lebanon is, I mean, Hezbollah is hitting them hard right now from what we can tell. I mean, it's like airtight. It's like that scene with the little blonde girl with all the people around her on the couch. That's Israel and Hezbollah. Look, laughing is anti-Semitic, guys. Do not laugh. So is truth. Yeah, right. Seems like everything is these days. Dude, if you weren't on YouTube, you and I could go back and forth. Oh, yeah. I think so. You got to roll over to Rumble so you can find me. I see you on Twitter and I see some of the things you post and I'm like, okay, real, recognized, real. Yeah, I've seen you on TikTok first and then I saw you on Twitter. They banned my TikTok. I was banned on everything, including Twitter until 2023 because of this, because of 9-11. And I live in Asia because I can't use banks and I can't use payment processors. And I never broke any laws. I didn't do anything wrong.
Just the ADL labels you and you're non-person. I didn't know that you were that targeted. That's the ADLs. They can cancel your bank accounts and all this? Yeah. All they got to do is, this happened to Scott Ritter, too, is make three false complaints in a row. And then they label you high risk. And yeah, they can do this. Everyone's been banned from PayPal and Patreon and all that. If you're not banned on PayPal, you're just not trying hard enough. Dang, I really need to get my shit together. Yeah. Well, the censorship has eased up a bit. They don't have the control they used to have. And it's because the media monopoly has been broken by TikTok prior to Larry Ellison, by Telegram, and by Elon Musk's Twitter, which is still not fair, but way light years ahead of Jack Dorsey. That's the big one. And then Rumble and Odyssey and Bitch Shooting Things, it broke the monopoly. So they have to, I think they also overplayed their hand when they banned so many people over COVID that they actually made viable competitors because so many people were pushed off YouTube. This is my hypothesis. But there's less censorship, too, because there's so many people speaking out. The whack-a-mole game. When you're like the only one, they'll hammer you bad. But when it's everyone, they just, they can't, they can't kvetch enough. Kvetch. Are you on other apps? You mentioned Rumble. Do you make content? Yeah, Rumble's the worst thing for them since Edges on Coins. Oh, they don't like that, do they? Nah, that's why I like Newton. Like, he put ridges on coins. He's a famous scientist, you know, gravity, all that. But I was like, yeah, but he worked at the Mint. And I actually saw his office. He put the ridges on coins to solve that problem. Wow. So Newton's good in our book? Isaac Newton's good, yeah. He's a good goy. No, he's a bad goy. Oh, he's a bad goy.
Which means he's good. Because he's good, right, right, right. Do you think that you're going to see, or we're going to see, American troops on the ground in Iran? Or are we already seeing that? Is it going to be? You might see special forces. You can't get the army there, because it's logistically impossible. It would take months to do. Yeah. So I just don't know. I guess they could deploy northern Iraq in the middle of that shit storm, with Shia militias. And the Iraqis don't really like Americans. Yeah. I wonder why. So, yeah, I don't think that is doable. And what are you going to go through the Zagris Mountains? If you want to lose, like, 30,000 soldiers, you could do it. America does have the firepower to conquer Iran if it wants to stomach tens of thousands of deaths. And it doesn't. We're casually adverse. That's why they say only nine have died. Yeah. Yeah. Six, because the media was there, and you couldn't lie about it. The drone hit them, all of them, at once. I mean, again, Lawrence Wilkerson says that, you know, to counter your claim there, that it's very hard for the United States Army to lie about how many have died. Like, so he actually weird, like, and I'm with you, you know, but he, like, weirdly said. No, it's hard for them to get away with a lie because this is going to come out. Yeah. But what they do, they just lie and let it come out. I mean, they constantly lie, and then later, so that wasn't true. That wasn't true. I mean, there's a lot of health-related incidents happening, apparently, right now. They casually launder. They'll say, oh, there's an accident on the base, or, you know, our own defense missiles hit our own F-15s three times in a row. An F-18 just fell off the carrier into the water. Sure, maybe, yeah. It's called casually laundering, and I think a lot of the veteran suicides were deaths. But that is a real problem that's under-addressed. I'm not sure how to solve it. Do you expect, I mean, it seems as though Iran's going to continue hurting Israel, and at a certain point, you have to wonder, though, like... Say it again. Yeah. It appears that Iran is flattening Tel Aviv as we speak. This is a very momentum.