Пересказ: Конгрессмен Мэсси в Конгрессе — дело Эпштейна и лоббизм Bayer
Источник: https://www.ryandawson.org/p/massie-listened-and-calling-them
Раян Доусон публикует выступление конгрессмена Томаса Мэсси (Кентукки) на заседании Конгресса. Два отдельных, но важных вопроса: дело Эпштейна и корпоративный лоббизм.
Часть 1: Дело Эпштейна — нет арестов в США
Мэсси задаёт Министерству юстиции неудобный вопрос: свыше 3 миллионов документов из дела Эпштейна опубликовано. Более двух десятков человек по всему миру ушли в отставку. При этом за рубежом прошли аресты:
- Принц Эндрю (Великобритания) — лишён титулов, арестован
- Питер Мэндельсон (бывший посол Великобритании в США) — арестован, исключён из Палаты лордов и Лейбористской партии
- Бывший премьер-министр Норвегии — обвинён
В США — ни одного ареста. Директор ФБР в это время праздновал на Олимпийских играх.
Мэсси называет имена тех, кого нужно расследовать: Леон Блэк, Джесс Стейли, Лесли Векснер (ФБР само перечислило его как соучастника, но «не имело вопросов» к нему).
Закон «Epstein Files Transparency Act» требует раскрыть внутренние меморандумы ФБР и Минюста о решениях по делу. Документы не предоставлены. Также отсутствуют материалы о мягком приговоре Эпштейну в 2008 году.
Часть 2: Bayer/Roundup — правительство под осадой лоббистов
Мэсси обвиняет все три ветви власти в капитуляции перед немецким концерном Bayer, который потратил более $9 млн на лоббирование ради иммунитета от исков из-за гербицида Roundup (глифосат):
- Главный прокурор одобрил позицию Bayer перед Верховным судом
- Начальник штаба Белого дома и генеральный прокурор работали в крупнейшей лоббистской фирме Bayer
- Указ президента объявил производство Roundup «приоритетом национальной обороны» — по мнению Мэсси, именно для защиты от исков
«Конституция гарантирует право на судебное разбирательство. Почему мы отдаём этот иммунитет иностранной корпорации?»
🧾 Транскрипт (формат)
The gentleman from Kentucky, Mr. Massey, for five minutes. Thank you, Madam Speaker. Congress created the Department of Justice. Congress funds the Department of Justice. And Congress is responsible for the oversight of the Department of Justice. When will we see justice? I'll tell you what I've not seen. I've not seen any arrests from the revelations in the Epstein files. Over three million documents. Describing horrible things. Describing unspeakable things. Much of it redacted. Over two dozen people have resigned. CEOs, members of government, worldwide. But I haven't seen any arrests or investigations here in the United States from this Department of Justice. Prince Andrew, Duke of York, who has since been stripped of his royalty, his royal titles, due to his affiliation with Jeffrey Epstein, has been arrested. Peter Mandelson, who previously served as UK's ambassador to the United States, resigned in disgrace from the United Kingdom's House of Lords and the Labor Party. And he's been arrested. Former Prime Minister of Norway, Torbjorn Joglund, has been charged.
But we don't see any charges, arrests or investigations in the United States. What do we see? We see our FBI director celebrating in the locker room at the Olympics overseas. It's fine to be proud of this country. But we should be proud of this country because we have a system of justice that works. And yet we do not. Who are the men that should be investigated? I'll name them right here. Leon Black. You don't even have to see past the redactions to see that this man needs to be investigated. Jess Staley, accused of terrible things. It's right there in the files. Why is he not being investigated? And Leslie Wexner, why did the FBI list him as a co-conspirator in their own documents in a child sex trafficking case and then tell him, according to him, that they had no questions for him? Why is that? Well, the Epstein Files Transparency Act requires the DOJ and the FBI to disclose to us their internal memos and emails about how they made those decisions, whether to prosecute or not prosecute. Yet they have not delivered those memos. And we still don't have the memos and documents and emails from 2008 to explain why Jeffrey Epstein was given such a light sentence in what would have been an open and shut case of child sex trafficking, which allowed him to commit those crimes, create hundreds of more victims, and ensnare so many other people in his conspiracy. Where are those documents that describe those decisions? We need justice. We want the Department of Justice to get to work, and that's what they need to do now. Madam Speaker, I rise today to let the American people know that this government is under siege. All three branches of this government is under siege by lobbyists and lawyers from a German company named Bayer. They spent over $9 million lobbying the executive branch and the legislative branch so that they don't have to be liable for any damages that their herbicide causes, otherwise known as Roundup. And they're having some success. Now, they haven't had any success yet in this chamber to get that immunity. They've had some success in the state legislatures, which are also under siege, to get this immunity from liability. Look, the Constitution guarantees people a trial if they've been harmed. Why are we contemplating going against the Constitution? The Attorney General has opined favorably for this German company in front of the Supreme Court about getting rid of any liability that they should have for any damages. And the most recent thing that we've seen, the executive branch. By the way, the President's Chief of Staff and the President's Attorney General worked for one of the biggest lobbying firms that's received hundreds of thousands, millions of dollars from Bayer. And maybe that's why we've seen an executive order that says that the production of this chemical from this German company is a national defense priority. And we know why they're doing that. It's to keep them from having any liability. Everybody in this country deserves their day in court. This is wrong. We shouldn't succumb to the lobbyists, not in the executive branch, not in the judicial branch, and certainly not here in Congress, and not in the state legislatures. But there's a lot of money at play. And I implore my colleagues to resist it and do not give them immunity. And I yield back. The Chair recognizes the woman from Minnesota, Ms. Morrison, for five minutes. The Chair recognizes the woman from Minnesota, Ms. Morrison, for five minutes. The Chair recognizes the woman from Minnesota, Ms. Morrison, for five minutes.