После Мэйкерфилда: прочь с избирательным цирком!

After Makerfield: Away With The Electoral Circus!

Источник: https://nickgriffin544956.substack.com/p/after-makerfield-away-with-the-electoral

So now we know. We know that Nick Griffin was right yet again. That Andy Burnham is going to become Prime Minister, that Reform wouldn’t have won the seat in Makerfield even if Restore hadn’t been there, and that Restore - far from walking it, as promised so confidently by Rupert Lowe and his online army - only just saved their deposit.

To put that into context, Restore’s 6.4% of the vote is a fraction of key by-election and even general election results won by hardcore “send them back” parties at intervals over the past six decades.

The National Front and the British National Party repeatedly won more than double that sort of figure. From Peter Griffith’s “if you want a n***er neighbour” victory in Smethwick in 1964, through Martin Webster’s stunning West Bromwich result in 1973, to the great results acheived by the BNP in Sedgefield, Oldham West (at 16.4% for Nick Griffin, the highest ever nationalist parliamentary vote) and Oldham, East, Burnley, Barking, Dagenham, and Keighley, the actual results achieved by hardline anti-immigration parties have repeatedly eclipsed the depost-saving scraping acheived by the much-hyped Restore last night.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not knocking Restore for their manifesto. I’m not criticising the good folk who follow Mr. Lowe’s forthright statements on X and wish that he could be Prime Minister. I am simply pointing out that last night’s showing confirms one very inconvenient truth: He is not going to be. Not ever.

In this regard, the much less noticed result in Aberdeen South yesterday is also very instructive - or should be. Voters there handed the Conservative party their first parliamentary by-election victory in Scotland since 1967. A party led by a Nigerian just beat the SNP with a campaign centred on a pledge to drill for oil in the North Sea.

Now, that is a very worthy plan, and one with obvious resonance in what was once Oil City. But the simple fact is that the Climate Change Act of 2008, the legislation which put Britain on the road to energy suicide, was supported by every Tory MP in the Commons, with only two brave rebel exceptions.

If the people of Aberdeen really understood the issue, they had a passably genuine choice in the election. They could have voted Reform, since Nigel Farage, to give him his due, has been a consistent critic of the whole manmade global warming scam since the 1990s (so have I, but that’s not at issue here).

Instead, on the basis on a simple policy U-turn and a potentially empty pledge, the voters backed one of the two parties which imposed the Net Zero lunacy on them in the first place.

Anyone who thinks that opposition to immigration will make the British public immune to future blandishments by the Tories, and guarantee a mass conversion to Reform, Restore or any current micro-party or future nationalist one, must remember the result in Aberdeen last night, in which Reform barely saved their deposit. If the elite are ever in real trouble, one or other wing of the Uniparty will simply give enough ground towards the dissent in order to let the steam escape.

So who is going to win in the next general election? Nigel Farage or Rupert Lowe?

Neither. Unfortunately, it will be Andy Burnham. He is going to topple Starmer and will then do one of two things:

Call a snap election, which will either be won outright by Labour or by a Red/Green/Muslim coalition, which will rule until the end of 2031 at least. Or he will wait until the last minute, in 2029, and before going to the polls introduce a PR system which will produce a Red/Green/Islamist coalition which will rule until 2034.

In either case, we will have open borders and taxes and hopelessness high enough to drive at least half a million native brits to emigrate for five years. With the high death rate of our elderly Boomer population, that will mean a demographic shift of up to ten million before the following general election.

Anyone who tells you that Reform, Restore, or any small but perfectly formed Nutzi party will be able to overcome THAT and form a government which will “save Britain” is either a conman, a time-wasting containment agent, or almost as big a fool as you are if you believe them.

Listen to me, people: THERE IS NO PARLIAMENTARY ROAD.

We WILL get our country back. That is already written. But it will take at least three generations, a total change in the economic and political structure of the world. And it will take the creation of an indigenous social, cultural and resistance movement which provides the structures, unity, identity, faith and self-help capabilities which will help our people consolidate the ground we still hold, return to breeding human-size families and reassert our rights.

It is also very likely that the forces pushing to turn legitimate worries over what is happening in Britain into civil war will get their way. And ballot papers are of absolutely no use when the Rivers of Blood start to flow.

So What Is To Be Done? First of all, nationalists and traditionalists must dispense with the shibboleths of plutocratic ‘democracy’, the superstition of parliamentary change, and the childish control myth that insists that extraparliamentary ‘force’ in defence of our existence and rights is in some way out of bounds to us.

Away with such nonsense! Away with the lies! Away with the cowardly refusal to face reality! Away with this obsession with the Elections Circus!

The question of ‘force’ is the subject of a major piece I am writing right now. I am not talking of ‘armed struggle’, of guns or bombs, of uniformed men, or any such counter-productive madness. Anyone who responds to the electoral ‘disappointment’ yesterday by speaking in such terms is a moron or a ‘Fed’. What am I proposing then? Subscribe now so you don’t miss what I have to say! And if you already know I’m right and agree, please consider chipping in with a regular paid subscription. Many thanks!