Элизабет Лейн о перевале Дятлова: «военная» версия
Источник: https://x.com/imelizabethlane/status/2047177720745152871
Краткое содержание
Лейн пересказывает свою реконструкцию трагедии группы Дятлова (февраль 1959 года, Северный Урал). В её версии — десять туристов (один сошёл с маршрута, осталось девять), после невозвращения 15–16 февраля спасатели находят палатку, разрезанную изнутри, следы босых ног, а позже — тела с нехарактерными для гипотермии травмами: как будто «по ним проехал грузовик», у одной из жертв (Людмилы Дубининой) отсутствовал язык, тела были обнаружены в разных местах на небольшом расстоянии друг от друга. Отдельно она обращает внимание на военную флягу, найденную у тел, и на фотоаппарат у Семёна Золотарёва — «не его камера».
«Военная» версия
Лейн последовательно отвергает «лавинную» и «животную» гипотезы: по её словам, одежда у тел была разрезана слишком аккуратно, «как у военного патологоанатома», а не разорвана, как это делают умирающие от переохлаждения. Аккуратность разрезов и сам факт перемещения тел она интерпретирует как свидетельство участия третьих лиц. Гипотеза в её пересказе: туристы увидели что-то, чего не должны были, их нашли военные и убрали как свидетелей; отсутствие языка — «символ» («ничего не видел, ничего не скажешь»). Финальное заключение расследования («непреодолимая стихийная сила») рассматривается ею как попытка скрыть обстоятельства, но не слишком аккуратная — иначе подделали бы версию «гипотермии» или «столкновения с коровой». В качестве аналогии Лейн упоминает дело Хиллари Клинтон и «неудобные» подделки отчётов у Клинтонов.
Значимость
Официальное заключение российского следствия 2020 года — лавина/снежная доска как причина ухода группы из палатки и последующая гипотермия с посмертными травмами. Ряд независимых экспертов (в том числе швейцарские гляциологи 2021 года) эту версию подтвердили моделированием. «Военная» версия, которую пересказывает Лейн, — одна из популярных конспирологических альтернатив, опирающаяся на конкретные детали (аккуратные разрезы одежды, отсутствующий язык у Дубининой, следы радиации на части одежды), но не имеющая документальных подтверждений. Читателю стоит держать в голове, что Лейн работает в жанре true‑crime‑популяризации и формулирует версии с высокой степенью уверенности без институционального расследования.
🧾 Транскрипт (формат)
Today we're talking about Dyatlov's Pass. Everyone was shocked when this happened and like it became Russia's biggest mystery and ton of people died in here. There were 10 hikers in total by the way it was supposed to be nine. February 15th rolls around and nobody's coming back. 16th rolls around nobody's coming back. They found the tent um the tent was cut open from the inside and then they noticed some footsteps and they found two of the hikers unclothed. So remaining four bodies were found their injuries are like as if one truck hit them someone like pulled it out pulled it out like the tongue out they died from those injuries they didn't die from hypothermia. They found some weird stuff. A military flask was found on the sea. So how the heck did military know something happened before 15. They set up the tent and they dropped the bodies in different places. How do you not find bodies there is like literally walkable distance from the rest of them. They found these four bodies and Zalataryov, the guy who was attached to the group, the last, had a camera. The problem is it was not his camera. I think that they genuinely like ran into something that shocked them so much that they were like if we hide the bodies what are we hiding them from? Like you know like what happened to them right? It's obviously not a fight. It's obviously not caused by another human. So I think honestly what they wanted to do they tried to figure it out themselves. They couldn't because it's so weird. like everything around this case is very weird you know. Yeah. So people say there are some like you know rumors that okay so what if tent got disrupted by an animal and they had to cut it because they were all scared and run out like it makes no sense. They also say that the reason they were in their underwear is because you know they died from hypothermia and then other people grab their clothes and they get bullshit because here's the thing you have to really read the investigation. Like you can't just rely on youtubers to tell you the truth because cuts were made so meticulously and so clean. It's almost like a military autopsy person cut the clothes not to destroy any evidence. Like no person that's freezing to death has time to nicely cut the clothes. No, they rip it off. That's what they do. Nothing was ripped. So clothes were really neatly cut. Yeah. The tongue thing is weird. Yeah. It almost like to me that my mind immediately... What about eyes? Yeah, my mind goes to that's a symbol. Like you saw nothing you say nothing. Right. That's what it to me that's the first thing I think of. That's a good point. Yeah, I never thought of that. Yeah. Like I think somebody... I think you're on to something when you say they were found by somebody maybe military and they saw what happened and they were like you saw nothing. Don't say anything. Yeah, but she was still alive when the tongue was ripped out of her. How did they know? It's the autopsy. That's what they say.
How did they know that? They didn't know whatever killed them. Someone else was there. Yeah. And he was placed face down, right? Yeah. So that only reinforces my theory. But another interesting thing is... Can you imagine how scared they were, the military themselves, then that the final conclusion was overwhelming force? Like if I was military and I killed them myself, right? I'm putting down like, I mean, you know, take an example from Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton. Like I'm putting down all the wrong, you know, autopsy results and all the wrong, but they didn't though. They could have said, oh, you know, they all died from hypothermia and they had a, I don't know, crash with a cow. I don't know, like something, right? Like,